Interview synthesis

Synthesis is the part of user research that takes a week and gets skipped under deadline. An agent can do the first pass, and the discipline is that every theme carries the quotes it came from so a researcher can disagree with it properly.

The job on one screen

Runs whenA research round finishes.
ReadsTranscripts, the research questions, participant segments.
DecidesWhich statements group together, and how strong each theme is.
ProducesThemes with counts, supporting quotes, and the segments they came from.
Stops whenThemes produced. Interpretation is the researcher's job.
Tools it needsTranscript store, clustering, quote index.
Autonomy to start atAssist. It prepares, a person decides and acts.

Optional: load a real model

Run it

The routing rules

These are the exact buckets the demo above scores against. Change the wording of a ticket and you can watch the confidence move.

BucketSignals it looks forWhat happens next
Reliabilityslow, failed, crash, timeout, unreliable, gave up, takes so long, errorTheme: people stop using features that fail unpredictably, even when the feature works most of the time.
Discoverabilitydid not know, did not realise, found out, showed me, hidden, could not find, existedTheme: capability exists but is invisible. Usually the cheapest problem to fix and the most commonly ignored.
Workaroundsspreadsheet, manually, workaround, copy, export to, our own, next to, insteadTheme: users route around the product. Every workaround is a specification written by someone who needed it.
Pricing confusionpricing, plan, cost, confusing, which plan, billing, upgrade, expensiveTheme: commercial friction. Confusion about what someone is paying for shows up in churn long before it shows up in support.
Below the barno clear signalA quote that fits no theme is kept as an outlier rather than forced into the nearest bucket. Outliers are where the surprising findings live.

Where this one goes wrong

Themes without quotes

A theme you cannot evidence is the model's prior, not your users' opinion.

Counting participants wrong

Ten quotes from one talkative participant is one participant. Count people, not statements.

Losing the outliers

The one participant who described a completely different workflow is often the most valuable interview in the set.

How you would know it is working

MeasureWhy that one
Themes a researcher keepsThe quality signal, and it is qualitative on purpose.
Quotes per themeUnder three and it is not a theme yet.
Time to first synthesisThe saving, typically a week to an afternoon.

Earning more rope

AssistFirst pass themes for a researcher to rework. Correct home.
ApproveThemes plus a draft findings document with quotes embedded.
AutoNever present synthesis as finished research. The interpretation needs a person who talked to the participants.
Keep the outlier pile. An agent optimises for the biggest clusters, and the finding that changes a roadmap is usually sitting in the pile of quotes that fit nowhere.

Related: Knowledge base gaps · Exit interview themes · Literature sweep · all agent jobs · Agent Lab home

Free from AI School - no signup, everything runs in your browser.